자산

재능. 침착.

비용: 1. XP: 1.

신비주의자
체력: –. 정신력: 1.

신속. 플레이 상태인 침착은 1장 한정.

직접적이지 않은 공포는 당신의 조사자 카드에 할당되기 전에, ‘명상’에 우선적으로 할당되어야 합니다.

마법 카드에 있는 능력 테스트를 하는 동안, 자원을 1개 소비합니다: 당신은 이번 능력 테스트에서 +1 능력값을 얻습니다.

Ilich Henriquez
과거로부터의 메아리 #113.
명상
  • Grounded (3) (Edge of the Earth Investigator Expansion #69)

FAQs

(from the official FAQ or responses to the official rules question form)
  • Q: What consistitutes a "skill test on a Spell card" for the purposes of cards like Spirit Athame and Grounded? A: A "skill test on a card" is any ability that directly prompts a skill test, either through the template "test skill (X)," or by initiating an action that is, in itself, a skill test (for example, any card with Fight, Evade, or Investigate action designators). - FAQ v1.2, Jan 2018.
Last updated

Reviews

I'm not sure why the designers felt compelled to break with the typical Composure design on Grounded, but it makes it markedly worse than the other four Composure cards released in Echoes of the Past. In most respects it is identical to the others. However, instead of having 2 skill icons and boosting 2 different skills for any skill test, Grounded has only 1 icon () and can only be used for skill tests when casting Spells. Most importantly, this means that, unlike the other Composures, Grounded can only be used on skill tests you initiate, not those required by treacheries, etc. This is a huge drawback, relative to the other Composures.

Additionally, the condition of all Composures that horror must be placed on it before being placed on your investigator is more or less mutually exclusive with Agnes Baker's innate effect. Essentially, you must decide either to not use her innate horror-for-damage effect--a key aspect to playing her--in order to use Grounded or Plucky, or discard the Composure and the benefit of its bonuses in order to use her effect.

Maybe if the designers had lowered the cost of Grounded to 0, and/or gave it 2 icons, and/or gave it 1 health instead of 1 sanity (though, that wouldn't really fit the theme), it would be a little more worth it. Or perhaps in the future there will be treacheries with the Spell trait, or Spell assets/events that use a skill other than that can benefit from Grounded. Even then, though, I'm not sure it would compensate for not being able to use its bonuses on treacheries or other non-Spell skill tests. Time will tell.

Herumen · 1719
I agree, this one seems like a worst of bunch. 2 Horror or a ? Skill mark should be there to make it different and yet somehow more playable. — XehutL · 47

Funny. Ward of protection and Shrivelling both deal you horror. So in any conventional Mystic deck this thing, intended to empower spells, is guaranteed to get blown up by said spells.

You get to use this thing once. Case closed, thing sucks.

P.S: Unless your spell assets are Rite of Seeking and Mists of Rleth, no Shrivelling in sight, then, eh, sure, it okay I guess, but who would build such a deck!?

Tsuruki23 · 2523
You do realize that you can still put horror on other assets - like the Holy Rosary or allies. I’m not saying Grounded is great, but it isn’t as useless as you present it as. — Death by Chocolate · 1447
Yeah this review isn't terribly helpful. The card has many issues (not the least of which being it basically only boosts one attribute in one situation unless you build your deck to include non-wp spells which we have few of atm) but asynergy with WoP and Shriveling really isn't too hard to overcome. — Difrakt · 1282
Agnes and Peter Sylvestre disagree with this review — vidinufi · 68